The Japanese island where it’s reigning cats

The Japanese island where it’s reigning cats

The island where it’s reigning cats… and there are no dogs: The Japanese island where felines outnumber humans six-to-one after they were introduced to kill mice

  • More than 120 feral cats live on Aoshima Island, where they have just a handful of humans for company
  • The cats were originally brought to the remote Japanese island to kill mice living on fishermen’s boats
  • Most of the local residents left Aoshima island to work on mainland Japan after the Second World War
  • But the cat population stayed and have since multiplied – meaning they now massively outnumber humans

3 March2020

An army of feral cats rules a remote island in southern Japan, curling up in abandoned houses or strutting about in a fishing village that is overrun with felines outnumbering humans six to one.
Originally introduced to the mile-long island of Aoshima to deal with mice that plagued fishermen’s boats, the cats stayed on – and multiplied.
More than 120 cats swarm the island with only a handful of humans for company – mostly pensioners who didn’t join the waves of migrants seeking work in the cities on mainland Japan after the Second World War.

خليجية

خليجية
Company: The majority of the humans on Aoshima island are pensioners who didn’t seek work on mainland Japan after the Second World War

خليجية

خليجية

خليجية

Aoshima, a 30-minute ferry ride off the coast of Ehime prefecture, had been home to 900 people in 1945.

The only sign of human activity now is the boatload of day-trippers from the mainland, visiting what is locally known as Cat Island.

خليجية

With no restaurants, cars, shops or kiosks selling snacks, Aoshima is no tourist haven. But cat lovers are not complaining.

‘There is a ton of cats here, then there was this sort of cat witch who came out to feed the cats which was quite fun,’ said 27-year-old Makiko Yamasaki. ‘So I’d want to come again.’

خليجية

خليجية

Japan’s Aoshima Island cats outnumber humans six-to-one | Daily Mail Online

Claire Danes discusses the ‘resentment & anxiety’ of motherhood: ‘It’s tough’

Claire Danes discusses the ‘resentment & anxiety’ of motherhood: ‘It’s tough’

Doing Homeland without Damian Lewis: ‘I’m going to miss him. A lot of people, even my friends, were saying, “Is he really dead?” And it’s absurd, but I think there’s a part of me that is also a little unsure. I’ll really start to believe it when we’re filming and he’s not there. That’s going to be hard and sad. I loved working with him and he carried half the weight of the show. So I’m a little bit daunted about what that means for me.’

Motherhood challenges:
‘Being a mum is incredibly challenging but we still feel a pressure to talk about it in very romantic terms. And it’s not just that. We all have that resentment at times and anxiety about being trapped by the role, that responsibility. And then chemically it can run riot. Your mental state, the hormonal swings are so extraordinary and singular to the female experience and they haven’t been taken very seriously or considered very deeply… I mean, post-partum aside, even if you have the most healthy relationship with your child and have support and resources, it’s tough. It’s really tough. And there’s no “off” button. [For me] that was the hardest adjustment. You always feel beholden to some****… And for so long they’re like koala bears, you just feel a physical responsibility to be there for them to cling to. It’s pretty primal.’

How her “cry-face” went viral:
‘I’m surprised it’s so surprising. I have my guy, who thinks I’m pretty enough in our life together, so I don’t need to be seducing the audience that way. I think it’s also just my style, what I like in creative work, what I’ve always been attracted to, even as a little girl… I liked the ugly even as a kid, and I think that has stayed with me now.’

Staying in Toronto in the winter while Hugh Dancy films Hannibal:
‘You’re just house-bound. I had to be strategic about how and when I took the garbage out. I mean, it was intense… I felt totally overwhelmed and displaced and I really didn’t have a sense of the city and was nursing all the time. Away from family and friends, it was quite extreme. Two months in, I accidentally found this mummy/baby yoga class where I met women who became best friends. I guess that’s common, you bond really fast…’

She’s very crafty:
‘It got to the point where the crew made a sewing station out of my director’s chair, one arm was a pincushion and I had this special light. It was ridiculous but, you know, delightfully so.’

On loving Hugh Dancy:
‘I’m genuinely in love with him. And I like hard things. You know, marriage is hard, but I’m up for it. I don’t do anything casually so dating is not for me. I would be marrying everyone I was with. When I met Hugh I was single for the first time and really looking forward to it, kind of bragging, “I’m going to rock this.” Then I met Hugh…’

[From Harper’s Bazaar]

Cele|bitchy | Claire Danes discusses the ‘resentment & anxiety’ of motherhood: ‘It’s tough’

صور "It’s A Bird . It’s A Plane . It’s Kylie" 2024 w,v

صور "It’s A Bird… It’s A Plane… It’s Kylie" 2011 w,v
<div>

<a href="https://***************/vb/showthread.php?t=90127" >

Do they know it’s time to stop band aid?

Do they know it’s time to stop band aid?

DO they know it’s time TO stop band AID?

The re-release of band Aid’s “Do they know it’s Christmas” (this time, to raise funds in the fight against Ebola) has been a huge commercial success – the single, which features everyone from Harry Styles to Bono singing lines, shot to the top of the national charts on its release on Monday and generated over $2m-worth of cash for the cause in the first five minutes of its release.

By the time Christmas actually comes, the fundraising single, a re-worked version of the original first released 30 years ago (sample lyric: "A kiss of love can kill you / And there’s death in every tear") will probably have raised in the region of $10m.

So, what’s not to like?

Plenty, to judge by the furious reaction the song has prompted in the UK national conversation, with a series of accusations that the song is patronizing, racist, counter-productive, reinforces stereotypes and even disrespectful to the predominantly Muslim population of Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea, who don’t celebrate Christmas.

The debate became particularly heated when a Liberian academic, Robtel Pailey, and the original Live Aid promoter Harvey Goldsmith went head to head on the BBC’s flagship current affairs radio program, Today.

Pailey said the song “reinforced stereotypes” and said it described the continent as “unchanging and frozen in time,” adding, “it ‘others’ Africa in many ways…it refers to ‘them versus us’ and that’s incredibly patronizing and problematic.”

(In fact, the original line, “Tonight thank God it’s them instead of you,” has been replaced with, ‘Well tonight we’re reaching out and touching you.’)

Goldsmith replied, “Does that mean we have to sit back and do nothing?”

Miss Pailey said band Aid should have supported African artists, such as Liberian musicians D12 and Kuzzy, who have released similar tracks to raise money for Ebola.

Goldsmith replied he had never heard of them.

The increasingly vicious debate has since migrated into newspaper columns and TV.

British-Ghanian rapper Fuse ODG wrote in The Guardian that he was "sick of the whole concept of Africa … always being seen as diseased, infested and poverty-stricken."

Janice Turner, in the Times, wrote, “How outdated the band Aid single feels. A bunch of old, white, rock titans come together with young, white, X Factor hotties to persuade Britain to heal Africa. Shuffle the lyrics of Do they know it’s Christmas to replace famine with ebola. Bish, bosh; that’ll do. … The record is raising money but it could have raised spirits too if Bob Geldof had reined in his ego. Why not have Harry Styles, Chris Martin, Bono et al play alongside musicians from Sierra Leone, Guinea and Liberia?”

Sir Bob, 63, responded with his usual colorful ******** to his critics. Appearing on Sky News he said (twice, much to the newscaster’s dismay) that critics who said band Aid should “stay silent” were “talking bollocks.”

Jack Lundie, Director of Communications for the British charity Oxfam, defended the single to the Daily Beast. “I think the debate is so heated because people really care passionately about changing the world,” he said. “And there is frustration, because it sometimes feels like stuff isn’t changing. And as a sector, we don’t tell the story of progress well enough.”

He said he supported the band Aid single as a “mainstream charitable initiative” that would “bring in people who wouldn’t normally engage”.

Of the song itself, and the criticism the Christmas-based lyrics have received, Mr Lundie said, “Band Aid is raising money to fight Ebola. The bottom line is that Ebola is terrible and the world is not doing enough. But if we define our approach by an over-literal analysis of pop lyrics, we will end up on a road to nowhere.

“Its cheesy pop. But if people really want to talk about the line, well, clearly, the song is not questioning whether people in the countries affected by Ebola know there is a holiday on the 25th of December.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/22/do-they-know-it-s-time-to-stop-band-aid